MMedSpaSoftwaresBrowse directory
Home/Practice Management
Practice Management · Med Spa Software

Best Practice Management for Med Spas

Compiled by MedSpaSoftwares · Updated September 2026

Full practice-management platforms: scheduling, EMR/charting, POS, and the day-to-day system of record for running a med spa.

MedSpaSoftwares scored 10 companies in Practice Management against a published, weighted rubric. Pabau leads with a score of 79.9/100. Every company on this list, including #1, carries at least one flagged consideration — see the full profile below for what it is.

No company can pay for a higher score or a better position on this page.
79.9/ 100
#1 Overall

Pabau

Scored September 2026 · Re-verified on a rolling cycle

Visit site ↗
✓ Published framework

Our ranking methodology

No company can pay for a higher score or a better position. Every company in this category is measured against the same weighted rubric.

25%
Core Feature Depth: EMR, Scheduling & POS
20%
Ease of Use & Onboarding Speed
18%
Pricing & Contract Flexibility
15%
Integrations: Payments, Marketing, Telehealth
12%
Multi-Location Scalability
10%
Customer Support Quality
Scoring limits

Scores are shown out of 100 for readability (raw weighted scores are calculated on a 0-10 scale per criterion). Every ranked company, including #1, is required to carry at least one published consideration, so a flawless-looking entry doesn't exist by omission.

Sources

Facts are pulled from G2, Capterra, Trustpilot, BBB, and vendor-published pricing pages, cited on each entry. Where a claim is vendor-only or unverified, we say so rather than presenting it as confirmed.

✓ No paid placement
✓ Same weighted rubric
✓ Sourced facts
✓ Consideration required
The ranking · Top 10

The Best Practice Management for Med Spas

Each column is one of the weighted criteria above, scored 0–10. Scroll right to see every criterion.

RankCompany
25%
Core Feature Depth: EMR, Scheduling & POS
20%
Ease of Use & Onboarding Speed
18%
Pricing & Contract Flexibility
15%
Integrations: Payments, Marketing, Telehealth
12%
Multi-Location Scalability
10%
Customer Support Quality
Score
1Pabau8.58.08.07.57.58.079.9
2Mangomint6.59.58.07.56.58.076.7
3Vagaro5.59.09.57.06.57.574.6
4Boulevard7.08.55.58.08.57.574.1
5AestheticsPro8.07.57.56.06.58.573.8
6Zenoti7.57.05.08.59.07.572.8
7Nextech7.56.55.07.08.07.067.9
8PatientNow7.06.06.06.06.57.064.1
9Aesthetic Record6.06.57.05.55.06.060.8
10Symplast6.06.55.05.56.05.557.9

Full profiles

79.9/ 100
#1 of 10

Pabau

Visit site ↗

Pabau ranks #1 in Practice Management with a score of 79.9/100, driven by G2 4.7/5 rating, All-inclusive features every tier, and Entry plan $59/month, 1 user.

Category scores (0–10): Core Feature Depth: EMR, Scheduling & POS 8.5 · Ease of Use & Onboarding Speed 8.0 · Pricing & Contract Flexibility 8.0 · Integrations: Payments, Marketing, Telehealth 7.5 · Multi-Location Scalability 7.5 · Customer Support Quality 8.0

Strengths: Strengths include G2 4.7/5 rating, All-inclusive features every tier, and Entry plan $59/month, 1 user.

Weaknesses: The one thing worth checking before you commit: Higher tiers contact-only pricing.

Our Take: The top score here is real, but higher tiers contact-only pricing is worth confirming directly with Pabau before you treat the ranking alone as the final word.

Why it ranked #1: Ranked #1: the highest weighted score in this category (79.9/100) across all 6 criteria.

76.7/ 100
#2 of 10

Mangomint

Visit site ↗

Mangomint ranks #2 in Practice Management with a score of 76.7/100, driven by G2 4.9/5 rating, Capterra 5.0/5, 99% positive, and Transparent pricing, no contracts.

Category scores (0–10): Core Feature Depth: EMR, Scheduling & POS 6.5 · Ease of Use & Onboarding Speed 9.5 · Pricing & Contract Flexibility 8.0 · Integrations: Payments, Marketing, Telehealth 7.5 · Multi-Location Scalability 6.5 · Customer Support Quality 8.0

Strengths: Strengths include G2 4.9/5 rating, Capterra 5.0/5, 99% positive, Transparent pricing, no contracts, and US support 7 days/week.

Weaknesses: No specific caution surfaced in our research for Mangomint yet — that reflects the current state of the evidence, not a clean bill of health.

Our Take: A solid option 3.2 points behind the category leader, with no specific caution in our research so far — worth a closer look if the leader doesn't fit your practice.

Why it ranked #2: Ranked #2: 76.7/100, 3.2 points behind #1 (Pabau) — most of that gap traces to Core Feature Depth: EMR, Scheduling & POS.

74.6/ 100
#3 of 10

Vagaro

Visit site ↗

Vagaro ranks #3 in Practice Management with a score of 74.6/100, driven by G2 4.6/5 (394 reviews), Pricing from $23.99/mo/location, and 30-day free trial, cancel anytime.

Category scores (0–10): Core Feature Depth: EMR, Scheduling & POS 5.5 · Ease of Use & Onboarding Speed 9.0 · Pricing & Contract Flexibility 9.5 · Integrations: Payments, Marketing, Telehealth 7.0 · Multi-Location Scalability 6.5 · Customer Support Quality 7.5

Strengths: Strengths include G2 4.6/5 (394 reviews), Pricing from $23.99/mo/location, and 30-day free trial, cancel anytime.

Weaknesses: The one thing worth checking before you commit: Salon/wellness focus, less clinical depth.

Our Take: A defensible pick if salon/wellness focus, less clinical depth isn't a dealbreaker for your practice, but it sits 5.3 points behind the category leader.

Why it ranked #3: Ranked #3: 74.6/100, 5.3 points behind #1 (Pabau) — most of that gap traces to Core Feature Depth: EMR, Scheduling & POS.

74.1/ 100
#4 of 10

Boulevard

Visit site ↗

Boulevard ranks #4 in Practice Management with a score of 74.1/100, driven by G2 4.4/5 (122 reviews), Capterra 4.6/5 (389 reviews), and Tiered pricing $159-$364/mo.

Category scores (0–10): Core Feature Depth: EMR, Scheduling & POS 7.0 · Ease of Use & Onboarding Speed 8.5 · Pricing & Contract Flexibility 5.5 · Integrations: Payments, Marketing, Telehealth 8.0 · Multi-Location Scalability 8.5 · Customer Support Quality 7.5

Strengths: Strengths include G2 4.4/5 (122 reviews), Capterra 4.6/5 (389 reviews), and Tiered pricing $159-$364/mo.

Weaknesses: The one thing worth checking before you commit: No free trial offered.

Our Take: A defensible pick if no free trial offered isn't a dealbreaker for your practice, but it sits 5.8 points behind the category leader.

Why it ranked #4: Ranked #4: 74.1/100, 5.8 points behind #1 (Pabau) — most of that gap traces to Pricing & Contract Flexibility.

73.8/ 100
#5 of 10

AestheticsPro

Visit site ↗

AestheticsPro ranks #5 in Practice Management with a score of 73.8/100, driven by G2 4.1/5 (39 reviews) and Transparent tiered pricing $160-$350/mo.

Category scores (0–10): Core Feature Depth: EMR, Scheduling & POS 8.0 · Ease of Use & Onboarding Speed 7.5 · Pricing & Contract Flexibility 7.5 · Integrations: Payments, Marketing, Telehealth 6.0 · Multi-Location Scalability 6.5 · Customer Support Quality 8.5

Strengths: Strengths include G2 4.1/5 (39 reviews) and Transparent tiered pricing $160-$350/mo.

Weaknesses: Worth checking before you commit: Multi-location only higher tiers and Extra users cost $85/month.

Our Take: A defensible pick if multi-location only higher tiers isn't a dealbreaker for your practice, but it sits 6.1 points behind the category leader.

Why it ranked #5: Ranked #5: 73.8/100, 6.1 points behind #1 (Pabau) — most of that gap traces to Integrations: Payments, Marketing, Telehealth.

72.8/ 100
#6 of 10

Zenoti

Visit site ↗

Zenoti ranks #6 in Practice Management with a score of 72.8/100, driven by G2 4.5/5 (311 reviews), Multi-location pricing customized, and Usage-based billing on add-ons.

Category scores (0–10): Core Feature Depth: EMR, Scheduling & POS 7.5 · Ease of Use & Onboarding Speed 7.0 · Pricing & Contract Flexibility 5.0 · Integrations: Payments, Marketing, Telehealth 8.5 · Multi-Location Scalability 9.0 · Customer Support Quality 7.5

Strengths: Strengths include G2 4.5/5 (311 reviews), Multi-location pricing customized, and Usage-based billing on add-ons.

Weaknesses: The one thing worth checking before you commit: Contact-only, custom-quote pricing.

Our Take: A defensible pick if contact-only, custom-quote pricing isn't a dealbreaker for your practice, but it sits 7.1 points behind the category leader.

Why it ranked #6: Ranked #6: 72.8/100, 7.1 points behind #1 (Pabau) — most of that gap traces to Pricing & Contract Flexibility.

67.9/ 100
#7 of 10

Nextech

Visit site ↗

Nextech ranks #7 in Practice Management with a score of 67.9/100, driven by G2 4.3/5 (41 reviews) and Capterra 4.1/5 (239 reviews).

Category scores (0–10): Core Feature Depth: EMR, Scheduling & POS 7.5 · Ease of Use & Onboarding Speed 6.5 · Pricing & Contract Flexibility 5.0 · Integrations: Payments, Marketing, Telehealth 7.0 · Multi-Location Scalability 8.0 · Customer Support Quality 7.0

Strengths: Strengths include G2 4.3/5 (41 reviews) and Capterra 4.1/5 (239 reviews).

Weaknesses: Worth checking before you commit: Value-for-money rated 3.7, lowest and 87% negative pricing reviews.

Our Take: A defensible pick if value-for-money rated 3.7, lowest isn't a dealbreaker for your practice, but it sits 12.0 points behind the category leader.

Why it ranked #7: Ranked #7: 67.9/100, 12.0 points behind #1 (Pabau) — most of that gap traces to Pricing & Contract Flexibility.

64.1/ 100
#8 of 10

PatientNow

Visit site ↗

PatientNow ranks #8 in Practice Management with a score of 64.1/100, driven by Capterra 3.9/5 (301 reviews).

Category scores (0–10): Core Feature Depth: EMR, Scheduling & POS 7.0 · Ease of Use & Onboarding Speed 6.0 · Pricing & Contract Flexibility 6.0 · Integrations: Payments, Marketing, Telehealth 6.0 · Multi-Location Scalability 6.5 · Customer Support Quality 7.0

Strengths: The clearest strength: Capterra 3.9/5 (301 reviews).

Weaknesses: Worth checking before you commit: G2 3.0/5, only 20 reviews, Custom-quote pricing, no free trial, and G2/Capterra scores diverge sharply.

Our Take: A defensible pick if g2 3.0/5, only 20 reviews isn't a dealbreaker for your practice, but it sits 15.8 points behind the category leader.

Why it ranked #8: Ranked #8: 64.1/100, 15.8 points behind #1 (Pabau) — most of that gap traces to Ease of Use & Onboarding Speed.

60.8/ 100
#9 of 10

Aesthetic Record

Visit site ↗

Aesthetic Record ranks #9 in Practice Management with a score of 60.8/100, driven by Capterra 3.5/5, mixed sentiment, Per-user pricing $12-$16/month, and Reported $399-$1,400 setup fees.

Category scores (0–10): Core Feature Depth: EMR, Scheduling & POS 6.0 · Ease of Use & Onboarding Speed 6.5 · Pricing & Contract Flexibility 7.0 · Integrations: Payments, Marketing, Telehealth 5.5 · Multi-Location Scalability 5.0 · Customer Support Quality 6.0

Strengths: Strengths include Capterra 3.5/5, mixed sentiment, Per-user pricing $12-$16/month, and Reported $399-$1,400 setup fees.

Weaknesses: The one thing worth checking before you commit: G2 5.0/5 but only 3 reviews.

Our Take: A defensible pick if g2 5.0/5 but only 3 reviews isn't a dealbreaker for your practice, but it sits 19.1 points behind the category leader.

Why it ranked #9: Ranked #9: 60.8/100, 19.1 points behind #1 (Pabau) — most of that gap traces to Core Feature Depth: EMR, Scheduling & POS.

57.9/ 100
#10 of 10

Symplast

Visit site ↗

Symplast ranks #10 in Practice Management with a score of 57.9/100, driven by G2 4.0/5 rating and Capterra 4.0/5 (25 reviews).

Category scores (0–10): Core Feature Depth: EMR, Scheduling & POS 6.0 · Ease of Use & Onboarding Speed 6.5 · Pricing & Contract Flexibility 5.0 · Integrations: Payments, Marketing, Telehealth 5.5 · Multi-Location Scalability 6.0 · Customer Support Quality 5.5

Strengths: Strengths include G2 4.0/5 rating and Capterra 4.0/5 (25 reviews).

Weaknesses: Worth checking before you commit: No published pricing, contact-only and Reviewers call it pricier.

Our Take: A defensible pick if no published pricing, contact-only isn't a dealbreaker for your practice, but it sits 22.0 points behind the category leader.

Why it ranked #10: Ranked #10: 57.9/100, 22.0 points behind #1 (Pabau) — most of that gap traces to Core Feature Depth: EMR, Scheduling & POS.

Explore other categories

Every category is scored on its own published rubric.

Browse all categories →